Genetically modified plants contribute to the fight against global warming
The large-scale cultivation of genetically modified crops would counteract global warming. American and German researchers come to this conclusion in a study.
Thursday, March 17, 2022
Agriculture also contributes to climate change. About 25% of global greenhouse gas emissions are attributed to agricultural production, most of them to livestock farming and fertilization. About a third of the climate impact of agriculture is due to changes in land use, for example expanding agricultural land at the expense of biodiversity-rich areas. These often contain large amounts of bound carbon, which is then released, for example, through slash and burn. The continued high demand for agricultural raw materials is driving the expansion of arable land. A reduction of this pressure would therefore have a positive effect on the climate. European agriculture could also contribute to this, as a new study by the University of Bonn and the California breakthrough Institute led by Matin Qaim shows.
The researchers describe that the cultivation of genetically modified crops already available today, such as maize, rape or sugar beet, saved around 33 million tons of CO2 equivalents each year in the EU. This represents 7.5% of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in the EU. Due to unfavorable conditions, only a few EU countries, such as Spain and Portugal, are currently cultivating genetically modified crops.
The main reason for these potential savings is the higher yields that can be achieved with genetically modified varieties. Experience in other countries has shown that the average increase in yields is 22%, but it can fluctuate strongly depending on the crop and the region of production. In moderate latitudes, as in Europe, yield benefits of 7-10% are realistic. Higher productivity in Europe would reduce dependence on imports, increase agricultural exports, and thus reduce the need for further expansion of global agricultural land. In addition, genetically modified plants also offer direct climate benefits, such as a reduced need for crop protection and tillage, which translates into reduced fuel consumption.
The authors point out that the skepticism about genetically modified plants in Europe has led to restrictive conditions that make cultivation almost impossible. The main reason for this is hypothetical risks that are not documented in the cultivation practices of other countries. As a result, the actual benefits of these plants, such as increases in yields and positive climate effects, cannot be exploited. The scientists are concerned about the EU's intention to significantly increase the land share of organic farming by means of the «Green Deals’, thereby further reducing agricultural production. This does not remedy adverse climate effects, but simply moves them abroad. The researchers call for greater use to be made of the resources available for productive agriculture in Europe. This includes modern breeding methods to increase the performance and productivity of agriculture.
At the end of October, swiss-food.ch hosted a film screening and panel discussion in Zurich on the subject of genome editing entitled “Between Protest and Potential”. The well-attended event dealt with the emotional debates in recent decades surrounding genetic engineering. The event showed that the situation has changed fundamentally.
To denigrate green genetic engineering, narratives that do not stand up to scrutiny keep popping up in the public debate. The aim in each case is political. Recently, the false claims are intended to prevent the regulation of new breeding methods such as Crispr Cas from being technology-friendly.
The science magazine "Einstein" of Swiss Television has addressed the new breeding methods. The report clearly shows that there is no way around these new methods if Switzerland wants to continue cultivating popular apple varieties such as Gala, Braeburn, and Golden Delicious.
In future, the EU wants to treat genome-edited plants in the same way as conventionally bred ones. As the "NZZ am Sonntag" writes, this is like a small revolution. Until now, the commercial use of gene scissors has been impossible due to an extremely restrictive genetic engineering law.