The wind in the genetic debate is turning
Politics and business are increasingly opening up to new breeding methods such as genome editing. Until recently, this would have been unthinkable. The change of opinion has to do with the voices from science, which are now slowly becoming heard. Even exponents of the Greens are no longer categorically opposed to the debate on new breeding technologies.
Monday, February 28, 2022
The genetic moratorium has been a sacred cow in Switzerland since the 2005 referendum. It has already been extended four times. Serious debates on new breeding technologies and advances in plant genetics have not yet taken place. Regardless of the opportunities offered by new breeding technologies, "GM-free" food continued to be elevated to the status of a quality feature of Swiss agriculture. But as the St. Galler Tagblatt writes, a change of heart is currently taking place in politics.
Opportunities instead of risks
Instead of just talking about risks and dangers, the chances of new methods of plant breeding are suddenly also being discussed. This is mainly thanks to researchers. In contrast to the past years, the voice of science is getting louder. And it is being heard. From a scientific point of view, the GM moratorium cannot be maintained. The Nobel-winning gene shears CRISPR/Cas9 offer the possibility of growing more profitable, pest- and disease-resistant plants within a useful period of time. Against the background of climate change, these are decisive advantages over the existing breeding methods, which require significantly more time for the breeding of a new variety.
Farmers are coming around
Farmers also recognize that research has provided important impetus. "Research can make an important contribution, especially in the development of more resistant plants," says Markus Ritter, president of the Swiss farmers' Association in the St. Galler Tagblatt. Farmers' openness to genome editing probably also has to do with the fact that climate change is forcing them to innovate. At the same time, it is an opportunity for them to operate more sustainably and to use fewer plant protection products. Christian Wasserfallen from the FDP argues along the same lines: "If we want to reduce the use of plant protection products and water consumption, we need these new technologies."
Overcoming dogmas
And Jürg Grossen from the GLP also wants to overcome old dogmas. The two agricultural initiatives of the summer of 2021 had made people aware of what farmers are struggling with. Genome editing offers the opportunity for more sustainable agriculture. Even the lady, Maya Graf (Green Party), who has become known for her commitment to the genetic moratorium, leaves the door open for debate: "I am not one who categorically fights for the moratorium until the last breath," she says in the St. Galler Tagblatt. And thus confirms the change in the discourse on new breeding technologies.
Related articles
How regenerative farming and AI can drive sustainable agriculture
Can regenerative farming, digital technology and artificial intelligence help us resolve the contradiction between sustainable and productive agriculture?
Imports instead of regionality: tomato virus destroys domestic production
Although tomatoes and peppers are among the most popular vegetables in Switzerland, most of them are imported. Extreme weather conditions and diseases are to blame. The first companies have already developed resistant tomato varieties – but the federal government remains sceptical of new technologies.
Catastrophic wheat harvest: Bad weather and restrictions on crop protection
The reports are piling up: 2024 will go down in history as the worst wheat harvest in decades. One of Switzerland's largest grain collection centres in Thalheim an der Thur suffers a historic loss.
« The Bernese winegrowers spray and spray »
The heavy rainfall this summer has hit Bernese wine-makers hard and once again made it clear that crop protection is essential – especially in difficult growing years. The fact that fungal resistance also affects crop losses shows how precarious the situation is. Nevertheless, the federal government is hesitant when it comes to the authorisation of modern pesticides and new breeding technologies.