«The fight against food waste starts in the field»
The Federal Council has issued an action plan against food waste. In fact, more and more people consider it ethically reprehensible to throw away food that is actually intended for consumption. The WWF estimates that around 177 kilograms of food ends up as waste per person per year in Switzerland.
Friday, April 5, 2019
The outrage against food waste strikes a chord with the times. It is indeed more than disturbing that there are still hungry people in this world while others throw away food. However, it is important that the fight against food waste does not stop at your own fridge. It starts in agriculture - in every field. The Swiss Society for Phytomedicine is concerned with maintaining and improving the health of plants. In fact, the protection of agriculturally utilised plants is a decisive factor when it comes to avoiding crop losses. The development of plant protection products also serves this purpose.
If we can only see as far as the spoilt yoghurt in the fridge, we lose sight of the full scale of the problem. A considerable proportion of the crops grown worldwide are lost to diseases and pests. The global average crop loss is 30 per cent, as a group of researchers from the International Society for Plant Pathology found in a study published in the scientific journal ‘Nature’. Potatoes, soya, wheat and maize suffer losses of around 20 per cent. Pests and plant diseases massively reduce the yield and quality of agricultural production. Worldwide, pests and plant diseases are a major burden and - due to networked commodity flows - also a rapidly spreading threat. One example is the marmorated stink bug, which is now also spreading rapidly in our country.
The benefits of pesticides should also be seen in this context. Effective control of food waste ranges from basic research at universities, to research by industry to identify new active substances, to the careful use of plant protection products in agriculture. Plant protection products reduce food losses in the field. However, they also increase the quality and shelf life of products. What has a longer shelf life is more likely to be used in the kitchen and does not end up unused in the bin. The fight against food waste is not just a question of personal morality, but an expression of a comprehensive ethic that does not simply accept food losses in agriculture.
Global warming leads to more pest pressure and plant diseases. This is emphasised by another study by international scientists on the effect of climate change on the spread of pests. Global agriculture needs answers to this. And these answers can only be provided by scientific plant protection. An attitude of denial, as demanded by two popular initiatives in Switzerland in 2021 that were clearly rejected by the population and called for a massive restriction or ban on crop protection, does nothing to combat food waste - on the contrary, it is harmful. After all, the growing world population can ultimately only be fed if we get food waste under control in the field. Of course, this is not a plea against responsible purchasing behaviour. But responsible crop protection and plant health are at the beginning of the chain.
Joel Meier is President of the Swiss Society for Phytomedicine. Phytomedicine deals with plant diseases. This article is an updated version of his guest commentary in the NZZ of 5 April 2019.
Related articles
PFAS regulation in Switzerland: Not faster, but better
Some people also call PFAS ‘forever chemicals’. Their use must be regulated as wisely as possible. To do this, the federal government first needs to do precise groundwork, according to Stefan Brupbacher, Urs Furrer and Stephan Mumenthaler.
When surveys create fear
Surveys on technologies such as genetic engineering often focus on risks and spread panic instead of promoting a balanced discussion of the pros and cons. A striking example is the environmental indicator of the Federal Statistical Office. Social scientist Angela Bearth is highly critical of the survey. The public debate on new technologies such as genetic engineering or 5G mobile communications is often conducted emotionally. Current surveys encourage this by stirring up fears instead of enabling an objective consideration of risks and benefits. One example of this is the environmental indicator, a survey conducted by the Federal Statistical Office (FSO) on the subject of hazards. Using simplistic questions, it generates distorted perceptions. In an article on the progressive Agrarwende.ch platform of the Eco-Progressive Network association, social scientist Angela Bearth addresses the issue.
False study on crop protection poisoning influences political decisions
In recent years, the alarming news has been making the rounds that 385 million people suffer from crop protection poisoning every year. The claim comes from a study by critics of pesticides. It has been taken up and spread by numerous media and government institutions. The problem: the number is wrong. The study does not even allow for the conclusion, which is why the scientific publisher in question has since withdrawn the study. Nevertheless, it has influenced politics and continues to be cited frequently.
The ideological misuse of «scientific» studies
Science serves as a basis for political decisions, including in nature conservation. However, a key question is: how trustworthy are the underlying studies and data? An article in the «NZZ am Sonntag» and the explanations provided by Quarks offer revealing perspectives on the quality of scientific studies and the possible misuse of figures.